Here Charitable Individualism is the key!… nothing less.

Posts tagged ‘indian’

Phaneesh Moorthy & Delilah!


The lawyer firm representing the woman who gave in  to the “facility” of being not only being in a physical relationship with her boss but also “retained” the zygote unilaterally, has curiously called this woman the “victim”!

This woman ‘gave in’ willingly or ‘seduced’ the CEO of iGate, is going to be the subject matter of the lawyers squabbling before the courts, that is only if an out of court settlement is not arrived at and the woman goes sniggering all the way to the bank!

What an easy “life” this woman had chosen!

Firstly, she says that Phaneesh and she have been intimate for more than a year! She curiously believed that she had been chosen for her skills in stenography and logistic support, but subsequent events have shown to the world that she had more, not only to offer, but that indeed she offered more than professional assistance to the CEO of the company!

Now this woman wears not merely her intimacy but claims that her present pregnancy was “caused” by him! Okay, let us assume that she was forced to have unprotected sex with her boss, yet there are many ways to ensure that such unprotected sex does not lead to an “unwanted” pregnancy! There is nothing to show that she even tried to preclude pregnancy. If she had been “HARASSED” into that relationship, why did she not avoid the pregnancy, by which, she could continue to have the job which helped her “eke out a living”? And instead of showing disgust at having to nurture the life of an egg fertilized by her “HARASSER”, she is wearing her pregnancy as a promotion gained through motherhood?

From the circumstances, Phaneesh Moorthy is seen as one who is an easy prey to the wiles of women who have sex willingly and once the heat and dust is over, CRY over spilt milk and all! The fact that this woman is trying to TAKE ADVANTAGE OF HER OWN WRONG, is one good reason for denying the EXTORTION RACKET which she has set rolling with the adept engagement of able lawyers!

Phaneesh Moorthy should have been clever enough to identify such “types” and got them sterilized before he engaged in UNPROTECTED SEX.

Now let us look at the fate of the AS YET UNBORN CHILD- he/she is UNWANTED by the man who is alleged to have “caused’ the child, UNEXPECTED by the woman, ACCIDENTAL and UNWELCOME as is being made out- but the woman is going to CRY & PLEAD BEFORE THE COURTS FOR CHILD SUPPORT and make for herself and for the lawyers a GOOD LIFE- rather a cosy one at that!

Or MOVID supposes that she just SEXUALLY AMBUSHED him– women are sharp enough to know those fertile period- and that she had chosen to go unprotected and got “so attached” to the foetus after the pregnancy shows, that she no longer wanted to lead the life of a drab support staff, but share the cream, which Phaneesh through his hard work and exemplary application had gleaned over a period of time!

This support staff KNEW fully well that PHANEESH was married and that he was still with his wife, does this knowledge not bring responsibility towards ANOTHER WOMAN who still enjoyed a better RIGHT? All those feminists who take up the cause of such Delilahs should ponder over this and SENSITIZE women who prey on other women’s men (if they believe that men could be OWNED)!

I hope the US Courts make this a landmark case and deny the benefits to such women who extort men after giving themselves a good life out of the resources of men and malign men and push men to go out of court settlement! 

If there is SANE and SOBER ADULT CONSENT, except for infections and child support, NO HUMAN BEING, IRRESPECTIVE of GENDER,  should be held responsible for the mere fact that they had sex. After all……………ALL LIFE IS STILL DEPENDENT ON SEX FOR PROCREATION! Let us get real!

 

 

LAWS OF THE MEDES & PERSIANS!


In two books of the BIBLE the laws of the Medes & Persians find prominent mention.

ACCORDING TO THE LAW OF THE MEDES & PERSIANS, ONCE A DECREE IS PROMULGATED, IT CANNOT BE RESCINDED OR ALTERED, COME WHAT MAY! THE LAW STAYS.

The books in the Bible are ESTHER and DANIEL. Both Esther and Daniel were from Jewry, but both belonged to a generation when the Jews were under captivity. Esther was chosen from among many who competed to become the queen of  an Emperor called XERXES (Ahasuerus) of Persia. His father was Darius, son-in-law of Cyrus, who founded the Persian Empire.

So historically when we try to put things chronologically, Daniel served Darius before Esther warmed the bed of Xerxes.

Before Darius took over BABYLON, there was a king called Balshazzar s/o Nebuchadnezzar, who saw a WRITING ON THE WALL and got the writing interpreted through Daniel. The interpretation was ominous, yet Belshazzar true to his word honoured Daniel with a robe, gold chain etc etc. The next morning Belshazzar was killed, or atleast deposed, and Darius took over as the King of Babylon. Thereafter Daniel is elevated to being one of the top three rulers of the land and exercises great control and influence over Darius, that the other nobles scheme to get Daniel into trouble. A decree is passed that none shall petition any God or man except the King for thirty days and if anyone dared to petition his God or any man, the  OFFENCE would be  punishable by death.

Daniel used to pray thrice daily to Jehovah. So the nobles put him up for trial before the king Darius and it was decreed that Daniel should be put in a Lion’s den overnight. Daniel is put in a Lion’s den and he survives ( i think the Lions were well fed before Daniel went in- after all the King was sympathetic to him you see!). Darius is relieved the next morning to see Daniel alive.

The decree that none shall PETITION GOD OR MAN FOR 30 DAYS, was passed as a decree under the LAW OF THE MEDES & PERSIANS. So, whoever be the person found to have disregarded the decree was punishable. SO even DARIUS was not able to help. But the interesting part is that Darius after finding Daniel alive after his stint at the den, issues another order that all the nobles who accused Daniel were to be thrown into the Lion’s den (whether the same set of lions or not, i know not!). IN ANY CASE, the LAWS OF THE MEDES & PERSIANS BACKFIRED on the jealous nobles. The Bible says that the other nobles did not find favour with the lions as Daniel had!

In the curious case of ESTHER, she had married a Persian XERXES, against the tenets of  the Jewish Laws (plz refer EZRA chapter 9, if you doubt that!). This anathema-tic marriage to XERXES had its benign fallout for the Jewry who were in exile at SUSAN PALACE of Xerxes.  Xerxes was also a Persian like his father Darius and his blood was bluer than that of Darius, as Xerxes was not a commoner ever. His mother was Tossa d/o Cyrus. SO XERXES was doubly BLUE. Otherwise how could one justify a virgin being sent as a sexual fodder for Xerxes each evening, and at dawn the deflowered virgin was to get back to the custody of a Eunuch in another harem, and until called for by name should never go before XERXES?

ANYWAYS, getting back to our thread, Jews were hated by the chief Minister of Xerxes. His name was Haman. But he was not sharp – serious condition of INTELLIGENCE FAILURE. Haman had an enemy by name Mordecai, who was a Jew. The relevant part was that Haman, despite holding a position of such authority, did not know that ESTHER was the COUSIN of MORDECAI and therefore ESTHER  should also be a JEWESS. SO in a classic case of cutting off the nose to spite the face, HAMAN gets a DECREE under the LAWS OF MEDES and PERSIANS marking a date for destruction of the persons and property of the Jews. XERXES issues the decree. He himself doesn’t know a damn as to the stock from where his second Queen came from. So much for running their Kingdoms.

Esther, like any sharp Jewess, acts on the advice of her cousin Mordecai. Ensnares the busy Xerxes to come for dinner to her palaces, seduces his palate before she makes a petition for her LIFE. XERXES is outraged that anyone would dare kill his primus inter pares concubine. She lays it all open and begs that she and her people be spared.

SO NOW THE DECREE PASSED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE MEDES & PERSIANS CANNOT BE RESCINDED OR ALTERED, SO THE KING ORDERS THAT THE JEWS COULD GATHER THEMSELVES TOGETHER AND KILL AND PLUNDER THOSE WHO TRY TO KILL THEM  OR VANDALIZE THEIR PROPERTIES!

So eventually, the JEWS end up killing those who wanted to kill them. SO the Jews celebrate that day as PURIM.

ANOTHER CLASSIC CASE WHERE THE LAWS OF THE MEDES AND PERSIANS BACKFIRED.

The TRUTH is that, NEVER EVER MAKE A PROGRAMME TO EXTERMINATE ANYONE. IT COULD BACKFIRE AND THE ANGEL OF DEATH COULD TURN TO THE PERSON WHO BROUGHT HIM THERE TO EXECUTE IN THE FIRST PLACE. AFTER ALL HE CAN NOT PUT HIS DRAWN SWORD IN HIS SCABBARD WITHOUT SOMEONE’S BLOOD!

That is why, the LAWS OF MEDES & PERSIANS did not survive. In India we have MALLEABLE LAWS, with provisos, exceptional clauses, interpretations, ingenuous orders and a long winding legal labyrinth to hide some where.

LONG LIVE INDIAN LAWS AND LEGAL SYSTEM.

 

 

 

 

Anand Jon, a sand nigger!!


The TIMES OF INDIA, dated 02/09/2009, Bangalore Edition screams on its front page that Anand Jon, a Person of Indian Origin and a Fashion Designer based in BeverlyHills, California, United States of America, had been sentenced to 59 years of incarceration by the courts.

Back home the sister and the mother of the convict, Anand Jon, have stated that the cases of rape, statutory rape etc. have been foisted on their brother and son by a prejudiced police force. The news item further states that the Beverly Hills Police Department cops had addressed Mr.Anand Jon as a SAND NIGGER.

Wiktionary gives the following meaning to the phrase SAND NIGGER:

sand nigger (plural sand niggers)

  1. (derogatory, offensive) A person of Arabian or other Middle Eastern descent.

It is not the prejudices of the Police, which is surprising, but the jury verdict. In the matter of Nathuram Godse, in the book titled THE MEN WHO KILLED GANDHI by Manohar Malgoankar, the author says, if the audience in the court had been converted into a jury during the trial of The Mahatma’s murder, the jury would have returned the verdict of NOT GUILTY on Nathuram Godse. So much for the jury. Luckily for Indians the jury system was abolished with the most interesting case of  Nanavati V. State of Bombay.

In the case of Nanavati v. State of Bombay, the husband who was a naval officer shot dead the paramour of his wife, by bringing a loaded gun into the house of the Paramour from his naval ship, when the paramour was alone. The jury got mixed up with MORAL ISSUES, instead of  returning a verdict on proved facts. The sympathy of the 12 good men is definitely going to lean in favour of the cuckolded husband. But the requirement of law is different- the judge was looking for legal ingredients like pre-meditation, sudden provocation, intention and the like. But the JURY was interested in returning a verdict that would palliate their own conscience. However the Judge found the verdict PERVERSE.

In Anand Jon’s case, a predominantly American jury, led by an American Judge, is not likely to take things easily when the charge was that Mr.Anand Jon was messing around with minor girls!!

The interesting part is the statement made by a girl who had turned 17 now and was a rape victim at the age of 14, by Anand Jon. Unfortunately, in statutory rape- which means that ingredients like consent, will etc. do not matter when the victim is below the prescribed age (in India it is 16 years). The very fact that a man had sex with an under-aged girl is sufficient to obtain a conviction under RAPE. Whether the girl in the instant case looked like 18 and showed sexual experience, whether she seduced Anand Jon for fame and name do not matter.

I like the statement made by that innocent babe in the woods- “Anand Jon stole my innocence!!” Oh, yes she did not know what was happening in the fashion world and she had to break that news of rape to her  father and is continuously traumatized about all that happened.

When these teenagers do not heed to the warnings  by their parents and succumb to temptations, should the society take up the burden of inflicting such harsh sentences on the perpetrators of such acts? I guess not. At least not by the 12 good men who are neither of Anand Jon’s ethnicity or colour or creed or coviction , much less the same profession!

In any case, as one of the Beverly Hills Police guy is stated to have said: YOU SAND NIGGER, YOU WANNA MESS WITH THE WHITE GIRLS?, it is better for us Indians to be warned about the prejudices that people harbour and unleash it without any sympathy, in times of judgement.

REMEMBER JON REMEMBER THIS: THE LAND AND THE DOUGHNUTS BELONG TO THE LOCALS, ALWAYS!!

Tag Cloud