Here Charitable Individualism is the key!… nothing less.

God & Rape pregnancy!


Indiana Republican Senate candidate Richard Mourdock is standing by his statement that when a woman becomes pregnant during a rape “that’s something God intended.”

“I spoke from my heart. And speaking from my heart, speaking from the deepest level of my faith, I would not apologise. I would be less than faithful if I said anything other than life is precious, I believe it’s a gift from God.”

For further reading on this plz refer to the link provided below:

http://www.stuff.co.nz/world/americas/7858312/Rape-pregnancy-Gods-will-Republican-candidate

Here is a statement made by a Republican Senate candidate who says that since his beliefs persuade him that LIFE comes from God, and LIFE as he believes, starts at CONCEPTION, even a pregnancy caused by RAPE is to be viewed as LIFE as mandated by God and accepted by the rape victim as LIFE granted to the zygote which she carries during pregnancy and should not go for termination of pregnancy.

This belief is okay had Richard Mourdock had been the rape victim and he had to carry the zygote for which the criminal had contributed without the victim’s consent. But that is not the case. The rape victim is someone else other than Richard, so for him to IMPOSE HIS BELIEF SYSTEM ON ANOTHER PERSON would be denying the right for the individual to decide on issues which impact her LIFE.

The issue is, the Rape victim’s LIFE is also a LIFE granted by God, with unalienable rights of INTEGRITY OF ONE’S PERSON. That integrity has been violated by the RAPIST and the trail of his crime is blossoming as the pregnancy in the victim’s womb. Now on the grounds that LIFE which is taking shape in the womb of the victim is from GOD, the pregnancy should not be terminated, is insulting another LIFE (Victim’s LIFE) which had also been granted by God. It is better to kill a symbol of CRIME before it had manifested itself as a full grown child and born into this world. 

Further, the woman who is carrying the child has the absolute right, along with the medical advice, to terminate the pregnancy.

To bring in the element of God and make a woman go through a pregnancy which she probably abhors, is the most damnable representation of God’s interest. GOD is GOOD and I am sure He would not want a victim to suffer further the humiliation of having allowed her egg to be fertilized by the sperm of a rascal who had inflicted this great evil upon a woman, who neither consented for the sexual relationship nor is happy after the pregnancy.

In Deuteronomy 22 chapter, of the Old Testament it says:

28 If a man find a damsel that is a virgin, which is not betrothed, and lay hold on her, and lie with her, and they be found;

29 Then the man that lay with her shall give unto the damsel’s father fifty shekels of silver, and she shall be his wife; because he hath humbled her, he may not put her away all his days.

if the senator is a man based on the Bible, he should also recommend imposition of 50 shekels of silver and ignore the Penal Code of the state of the USA, for the offence of RAPE. It is time that people become progressive. Even though the society has almost stopped capital punishments even for heinous crimes, it no where takes away the personal LIBERTY OF A HUMAN BEING to decide on issues relating to one’s body. This recommendation by the Senator is truly REGRESSIVE!

Using the name of God to sustain a criminal symbol is the last thing, which a would-be Senator should advocate! God bless America!

Advertisements

Comments on: "God & Rape pregnancy!" (1)

  1. The point i would like to make here is that without the consent of God, nothing comes to life.

    When a Man and Women Love each other and get married and out of this wedlock and lovemaking a new life comes into being, first in the womb of the mother, which brings bliss to the whole family. The would-be father brings many gifts for the new mother and the whole family celebrates. The new mother is treated like a princes by the family members. After 9 months a baby is born and is being kissed by almost everyone present at the place of birth. The mother loves its baby very much and the father is proud to have fathered a beautiful baby. This is how babies are born and we were also born the same way.

    Now because of poverty or some other reasons the husband and wife try to abort the baby as soon as it comes into existence then they both will be committing a sin which will be viewed by God very seriously.

    Here comes the another process: A criminal having his lustful eyes on a female from many days takes an opportunity to sexually assault her out of which a new life comes into existence in the womb. The life which comes into being by such a process is first viewed with hate. Nobody loves the fetus so formed, and the victim is abused by the whole society for no fault of hers, and if the life is preserved in the womb for 9 months then the baby born will be termed as a bastard which is gender-neutral. In this process of becoming pregnant a woman may suffer psychological or nervous diseases, and also her sanity will be be affected, or that shame may be brought upon her family for a matter in which she is not guilty of any sin, or that the child will not find any place of safety, when if this is the case, I think there is no wrong with her aborting the fetus and i think God will also forgive this.

    Now the third process which you have not discussed in your blog: If two lovers love each other and meet in a secluded place regularly and out of which a new life comes into existence, first in the womb of the woman, sends shivers to the spine of the girl when she first misses her periods. This news is communicated to her boyfriend in a very secretive manner and he regrets for not using the contraceptives at the proper time. Both are equally guilty of committing fornication. Now if the woman gives birth to such a child, she is called unchaste by the society and her parents will be shameful by her act and nobody in the society will accept the child.

    If both the lovers decide to get the fetus aborted, then they will be going against the will of God and committing a sin which will be viewed seriously by God for two mistakes, one is for fornication and the other is for aborting the baby thus came into being.

    The Senator Mr. Richard Mourdock said in his statement that he was misunderstood is absolutely bullshit. He is not misunderstood but he has been understood as he is. Being a Senator he should not have made this type of statement.

    He must have committed adultery when he was young and got the fetus aborted which came into existence by his adultery and got it aborted and now as he has become old and may be wants to make off for his sins committed earlier when he was young……. lol

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Tag Cloud

%d bloggers like this: