Here Charitable Individualism is the key!… nothing less.

Archive for February, 2011

Extradition & Julian Assange!


The British courts have decided to extradite Julian Assange to bring him within the jurisdiction of the Swedish courts. The matter in trial where the Swedish Prosecutor wants Assange, relates to Julian Assange’s alleged sexual crimes.

The interesting part about SEXUAL CRIMES is that when a CRIME begins and when the CRIME committed is condoned, depends on the GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION where the said SEXUAL ACT is committed. In Sweden the laws are very different from those in Australia. In Sweden the term “CONSENT” does not mean that once a woman gives her  consent,  till the culmination of the sexual act, the man is at liberty to have his member in. In fact, the CONSENT stands withdrawn the moment the woman withdraws her consent even during the intercourse. ANY DELAY IN WITHDRAWAL would tantamount to RAPE. So Julian Assange is accused of RAPE of this kind.

Secondly, the subsequent normal behaviour of the WOMAN with the seducer does not offer any immunity to the man from the woman bringing up RAPE charges later.

The most interesting part is that Julian Assange is accused of the charges of RAPE committed during the above mentioned bizarre situation, which make up the act, RAPE as per local laws and interpretations thereof . There were only 2 persons and one is accusing the other and the laws are loaded in favour of  the ACCUSER. The court has to merely ask Assange if he had had sex with the accuser and if he says ‘yes’, the next question would be with the prosecutrix and if she says that she withdrew her consent, ASSANGE stands condemned. Assange stands NO CHANCE in the Swedish courts with these kind of LAWS. Seems more like a NON REBUTTABLE RES IPSA LOQUITOR!!

Assange apprehends that he might be subsequently extradited to the USA and might be deported to the Guantanamo Bay. Well, why should ASSANGE not ask the courts in Britain to return him back to the British after the trial and sentence, if any,  in Sweden? I see no reason how the Swedish courts could extradite a person (borrowed from another jurisdiction for the purposes of making a suspect amenable to their jurisdiction) to another requesting state!

I feel that once a system is challenged, the beneficiaries and hangers-on of the system feel threatened and use every Machiavellian device to silence the threatener (Julian Assange).  Julain seems to be hounded out for this.

CONSENT in sex instead of helping WOMEN victims, are being used by unscrupulous women to silence people like Assange.. In any case, the biological laws of sex in men are  just like the Laws of Limitation, that once  TIME statrts running it doesn’t stop………………….till it runs the full course. But to help victims of “NO PROOF” cases, such LAWS were enacted and now the same aspect of NO PROOF is being used to put Assange in the dock. HOW PERVERSE!!

COMPANY POLICY and all that jazz!


AIRTEL discontinued raising bills in hard copy and posting it to their customers for the past 2 months. So don’t be surprised if your AIRTEL connection is disconnected for non-payment.

At the time of entering into a contract with the wretched AIRTEL, through their conduct it was inferred that they would send a copy of their bill to the address mentioned in the application form. All of a sudden wretched AIRTEL realizes that they would be able to cut down on their cost if they e-mailed my bill – in the event of my not having accepted to settle my bills through ECS. So suo motu the wretched AIRTEL, stops sending me bills and disconnects my telephone connection.

So i make a trip to their branch and meet their customer manager and ask him for my bill. He tells me that the bills had been e-mailed to my e-mail address and that if i wanted restoration of the services i had to settle their claim. With the bills INFLATED and no way to verify their claims, yet hard pressed for resumption of the telephone services i grudgingly settle their unverifiable claim.

During the course of my interaction with that manager from the wretched AIRTEL, he told me that a communication was sent to me stating that from January 2011 wretched AIRTEL would not be sending bills by post and that if i wanted for continued service by post i had to REQUEST for the same failing which my “SILENCE” would be construed by the wretched AIRTEL as ACCEPTANCE of their proposal to receive my bills through e-mail and not through post.

With all the recruitment of the best brains from the best LAW COLLEGES of India, the wretched AIRTEL prescribes SILENCE as a mode of ACCEPTANCE of their OFFER. When that was pointed out to the Manager (so designated by the wretched AIRTEL!) he said that it was their COMPANY POLICY. I told him that merely because i did not act on their proposal, my inaction coupled with silence could not be construed as ACCEPTANCE of their OFFER.  Naturally, the fool was in no position to understand what i was talking about, he continued to parrot CMPANY POLICY et al.

I settled the bill and as i walked out in a huff, the fellow comes up to me and says, “Sir, that is the company policy. And you see the year is closing and  AIRTEL wants to mop up and bring in an uninterrupted flow in revenues and most of the harassed customers would accept ECS and thereby get rid of the headache of having to monitor and settle bills. And we in turn don’t have to chase customers for payments. ” I sort of felt sorry for that Customer Manager, he sensed that he was to pacify a distraught customer and the only way he could do that was to go against the Company which was paying him- and bad mouth wretched AIRTEL.

I forgot my Law of Contracts. I was happy that wretched AIRTEL’s Manager was on my side. After all even he was willing to bad mouth AIRTEL. We bloody Indians have no set principles, we just wanna placate and be placated. I am a bloody INDIAN too, i felt placated!!

Tag Cloud